4. Civilización v. barbarie
Generation of 1837 Binary oppositions (black-and-white thinking)
Generation of 1837
  • Post-Enlightenment concepts of liberty / equality / democracy (influence of French Revolution)
  • Spirit of European Romanticism
    • Byron, Goethe, Schiller, Hugo, Chateaubriand (Atala)
    • Hypostatization of landscape as sublime (freedom, immensity, escape from claustrophobic, unenlightened society, or, later industrial modernity)
    • Problem in applying this to Argentina
  • Dilemma
    • Rosas was a dictator, but with a popular power base
    • Attitude towards the populace
    • In order to denigrate Rosas, the Men of 37 had to denigrate the people
"In an odd sense, democracy was both the problem and the solution for the thinkers  of 1837. On the one hand, they subscribed in principle to notions of institutional  representative government; on the other, they deeply distrusted the will of the  people since the masses were solidly behind Rosas and the traditional  authoritarianism he represented. Without the active support of the masses, Rosas  could never have retained power as long as he did. The mission of the Men of '37  then is a mission of paradox. They must discredit the masses and the 'inorganic  democracy' represented by caudillo rule while at the same time reorganizing Argentine  society in the name of the masses and laying the foundation for institutional  democracy once the masses are ready for it." (Shumway, 133)
  • Racism
    • Depiction of Federalists as uncouth, racially mixed rabble

Binary oppositions (black-and-white thinking)

  • Civilization = City / Barbarism = Countryside
  • Binary oppositions tend to undo themselves: one term depends on other
  • Construction of myths of nationhood always depends on exclusion of some other
    • Ambivalent construction runs through these texts
  • Powerful way of reading these texts: tease out the unsustainability of the oppositions presented
    • Deconstructive reading of the instabilities at the heart of the oppositions which construct the nation
    • From nation to dissemination
  • In the end, the Nation is a powerful fictive construct
  • Janus-faced ambivalence of language and Janus-faced discourse of the nation
"It is the project of Nation and Narration to explore the Janus-faced ambivalence of language itself  in the construction of the Janus-faced discourse of the nation. This turns the familiar two-faced god  into a figure of prodigious doubling that investigates the nation-space in the process of the  articulation of elements: where meanings may be partial because they are in media res; and  history may be half-made because it is in the process of being made; and the image of cultural  authority may be ambivalent because it is caught, uncertainly, in the act of ‘composing’ its powerful  image." (Bhaba, 3)