"In an odd sense, democracy was both the problem and the solution for the thinkers
of 1837. On the one hand, they subscribed in principle to notions of institutional
representative government; on the other, they deeply distrusted the will of the
people since the masses were solidly behind Rosas and the traditional
authoritarianism he represented. Without the active support of the masses, Rosas
could never have retained power as long as he did. The mission of the Men of '37
then is a mission of paradox. They must discredit the masses and the 'inorganic
democracy' represented by caudillo rule while at the same time reorganizing Argentine
society in the name of the masses and laying the foundation for institutional
democracy once the masses are ready for it." (Shumway, 133)